🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for playing the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, however, may align so closely with the mythologized image promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it functions as a endorsement instead of a challenge.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to forge a tailor-made version of Putin. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a TV series released last October, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a invented security officer selected by fate to “rescue” the nation from chaos. Although the character's name Mikhail, the implication is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals often end up reinforcing this same narrative rather than debunking it. A new film based on a popular book aims to subvert the leader's mythology by framing him not as a cause but as a symptom, moving the narrative weight to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, Putin is presented as having been picked by influential figures to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking enduring influence.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one actually pleaded with him to take the job. The presidency was in essence a selection process with many contenders. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country in practice.

• The shortlist included several politicians, including an opposition leader later murdered and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the required parameters: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the process said the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Claims about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not engaged in field operations.

Curiously, the shift to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by the actor's arrival as 007. His harder interpretation led Russian media and online audiences to draw visual parallels with their leader. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with Putin’s appeared on Moscow streets, fueling the increasing trend to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an omnipotent figure who remains unseen on screen. His influence is hinted at through portraits or calls “from above”. Now, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally validate the exact legends it might seek to examine.