🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare it to what the typical American pays. I know dozens of businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When you add these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many federal defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.